Book Review: The Storm of Steel by Ernst Junger

Just about everyone has heard of Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front, it is the work of fiction about World War I. It has been made into a movie several times and is supposed to represent the inhumanity of the war and the hopelessness felt by its participants in the trenches.

Ernst Jünger in World War I

Ernst Jüngers, The Storm of Steel by contrast, is a different sort of World War I book entirely. Where Remarque wrote an anti-war novel based on his experiences in the war, Jünger not only did not write an anti-war account of the war he positively relished his time in the trenches. Jünger was wounded six times during the war. He spent the entire war on the Western Front, usually in the British sector. He was also involved in almost every major battle that occurred in the West to include the Archangel Offensives by the Germans and subsequent German retreats in 1918.

He writes a straightforward account of what he did and where he was without very much in the way of soul-searching. The biggest thing that comes across in his account of the war is how exhilarating he felt combat to be. One of the biggest things he complains bout, if you can call it complaining, was the way that rations got worse as the war went on. He is never apologetic for the German cause nor does he express doubts that his cause was right.

He provides some vivid descriptions of the experience of combat. One of the best is his description of what it was like to undergo an artillery barrage. It is so good that it is worth quoting in full as it aptly describes receiving indirect fire and it provides a taste of his writing style. The account is from 1916 during the British Somme Offensive and his unit was being bombarded:

I believe I have found a comparison that exactly conveys what I, in common with all the rest who went through the war, experienced in situations such as this. It is as if one were tight to a post and threatened by a fellow swinging a sledge-hammer. Now the hammer is swung back for the blow, now it whirls forward, till just missing your skill, it sends splinters flying from the post once more. That is exactly what it feels like to be exposed to heavy shelling without cover.

The Storm of Steel should be on the reading list of anybody interested in World War I who wants an uncensored account of what life was like for a German soldier on the Western Front. I heartily recommend this book.

The Actual Writing of a Thesis-Part 9

Well, I figured it is time for another update.  I have made the first round of changes to my rough draft and turned them back in and my thesis made it past my professor and is now in the hands of the second reader.  It went up to the second reader Tuesday and I should get it back sometime next week for corrections, if any.  If there are no corrections needed it will go the department Chair and then I will get a final grade for the thesis and the thesis class. 

At that point I will be done with my thesis and should only need to receive word from the university that I have met the requirements for graduation.  If that happens then my current conferral date will be 15 May and I will be the proud holder of a Master of Arts Degree in European History.  As long as the final grade on my thesis class is not below a C, I should graduate with honors.  I currently have a 3.93 GPA and don’t think I really have to worry about getting a bad grade on my thesis but I am keeping my fingers crossed anyway because the class is not over.

As ever, stay tuned. :)

I Suppose I Can Consider Myself Published Now

I got my first article published this past week.  I belong to the Society for Military History and in a recent society newsletter, they asked for people who had recently worked in an archive to submit a guide.  I visited the Austrian Kriegsarhive last spring while doing research for my MA thesis and emailed them contact person that I would be interested in providing a guide for the Kriegsarchive.  I got a positive response and pulled out my notes and recollections of my visit and over the next week or so, I wrote up a guide.  It has now been posted on the SMH website at: Österreiches Staatsarchiv- Kriegsarchiv in Vienna, Austria.  Now I have at least one line to go into my CV for things I have published.  I also have a couple of articles I am working on for journal submission but that will only occur after I finish my Thesis later this month.

This post is my spam magnet for some reason.  I am going to start approving all the spam comments that get attached to this post.

The Actual Writing of a Thesis-Part 5

I finished Chapter 2 of my thesis last night, ten days later than I planned, but finished is finished right?  it was the chapter about the opening skirmishes and battles of the Königgrätz Campaign.  It was fun to write but difficult at the same time.  I essentially knocked out a twenty-page paper in two weeks where I normally wrote that much in a month being much more leisurely about it.

Now I just have to work extra hard to catch up and get my paper done by the deadline for the rough draft, which is on February 20th.  I should be able to do it because the next chapter and the concluding chapter are the ones I will enjoy writing the most.  Only three more weeks until the rough draft is complete.  I am very curious to see what kind of revisions and expansions my advisor will want me to make.

THE SAGA CONTINUES.

Book Review: Frederick the Great On The Art of War

Jay Luvaas is a professor at the U.S. Army War College in Carlisle Pa.; he coauthored a series of Battlefield Guides of U.S. Civil War battlefields that became almost instant classics. He has authored several books of military history such as “The Military Legacy of the Civil War: The European Inheritance”, “The Civil War: In the Writings of Col. G.F.R. Henderson”, and “Napoleon on the Art of War”. He has also authored many articles in peer-reviewed journals such as Parameters, the Journal of the U.S. Army War College and the Civil War Times Illustrated.
Professor Luvaas prefaces his work by pointing out that the book is not a straight chronological presentation of the writings of Frederick the Great, but instead he has ordered the writings of the king so that they are presented as themes with the work in each section presented chronologically. This is an eminently practical method for organizing the work in a useful manner while also allowing the reader to more easily grasp the way in which Frederick’s thoughts changed as he gained experience in warfare. He groups Frederick’s writings on such topics as logistics, tactics, and strategy in such a way that the reader can easily see the maturation of the sovereign’s thoughts.
Frederick the Great was arguably one the ablest generals of his age, on a par with Marlborough. He led the tiny North German Kingdom of Prussia from relative obscurity and set it on the path to greatness. He waged a successful campaign to seize and hold Silesia during the course of two wars with Austria between 1740 and 1745. He then successfully defended his Kingdom during the Seven Years War against a coalition of the great powers of Europe Russia, Austria, and France. During these campaigns, he demonstrated his ability of command by several times defeating armies superior to his. Perhaps his most famous battles are Leuthen and Torgau.
Frederick revolutionized the Prussian army and turned it into a potent weapon of war, by changing the tactics of his army and drilling them to perfection. He is also credited with the innovation of the attack in oblique order in modern times, which allowed him to outflank and defeat his enemies. The Prussian army under Frederick became feared throughout Europe and many of Prussia’s enemies attempted to emulate their methods though none did so completely successfully.
Frederick’s thoughts on warfare are valuable as insights into how he fought his campaigns. The caveat is that Frederick relates his thoughts pertaining to how to fight with the armies that he knew, his principles are not timeless but are instead limited to his time. If you are going to be leading an eighteenth century army into battle, he should be required reading, but given how much the nature of warfare has changed his thoughts are not particularly applicable to modern war.
Perhaps the most valuable part of the whole book is the history that Frederick wrote of his campaigns during the Seven-Years War. Few sources are more valuable in military history than the thoughts of the commander involved. While with many wars throughout history, the historian has to guess at the motives of the commanders involved, Frederick allows the historian a rare glimpse into the mind of a great general. There are many writings by generals from the seventeenth century and beyond but few tried to write their own history. Who is else is more qualified to write about the thoughts and motivations of the commander than the man himself is.