{"id":4274,"date":"2014-06-03T06:00:46","date_gmt":"2014-06-03T04:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.military-history.us\/?p=4274"},"modified":"2016-04-18T07:14:28","modified_gmt":"2016-04-18T05:14:28","slug":"the-battle-of-antietam-17-september-1862","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/2014\/06\/the-battle-of-antietam-17-september-1862\/","title":{"rendered":"The Battle of Antietam – 17 September, 1862"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Battle of Antietam is interesting for several reasons the most important of which for me is that it is the single bloodiest day in American military history. There have been bloodier battles in American wars but no single day matches the blood spilled on those Maryland fields that early day in 1862. The Union victory at Antietam, if you can call it a victory, also provided Abe Lincoln with the opportunity to promulgate the Emancipation Proclamation<\/a>. An executive act that was totally unconstitutional but that he did anyway for domestic and foreign political reasons.<\/p>\n

Antietam was the final battle of Lee’s first invasion of the North and while it was not a decisive battle it changed things because of what came after. \u00a0If anything, from a purely tactical and operational standpoint the battle was a draw. \u00a0Both sides essentially beat themselves bloody over a few square miles of Maryland territory that neither considered vital. \u00a0The battle is only considered a Union victory because Lee took his army and left instead of renewing the fighting for a second day leaving the Army of the Potomac in possession of the battlefield.<\/p>\n

The commander of the 75,000 man, six Corps strong Union Army of the Potomac was General\u00a0George B. McClellan. \u00a0He was opposed the 39,000 man two Corps\u00a0Confederate Army of Northern Virginia commanded by General Robert E. Lee.<\/p>\n

In the fall of 1862 following the Confederate victory at Second Manassas Lee decided to invade Maryland. There were several competing reasons for this decision. One was that it was thought that that best way to force the Union to a negotiated settlement was to inflict a defeat on Northern forces on northern soil. Another was the hope that by successfully taking the war to the North the Southern states could win foreign recognition and potentially aid. It was also believed that Maryland was the state still in the Union whose population was the most sympathetic to the southern cause. Lastly, Lee believed that by invading Maryland and threatening the capture of Washington D.C. he could force the Army of the Potomac under McClellan to accept battle on his terms.<\/p>\n

The invasion began on 3 Sep. 1862 and almost immediately (McClellan was a notorious slowpoke)<\/em> provoked a reaction from the Union forces garrisoned in and around Washington D.C.<\/p>\n

\"Movements<\/a>

Movements at the Battle of Antietam Sep. 3-17, 1962
Map Courtesy CivilWar.org<\/p><\/div>\n

There were several skirmishes and minor battles prior to the culminating battle of the campaign at Antietam. The most significant of these was Stonewall Jackson\u2019s capture of the federal garrison and Arsenal at Harper\u2019s Ferry on Sep. 15th. This was the largest surrender of Federal troops during the war and the loss of weapons was considerable. The Confederates captured roughly 13,000 small arms, 200 wagons, and 73 artillery pieces when they took the Arsenal.<\/p>\n

In the days leading up to the battle McClellan was slowly gathering all the disparate forces of the Army of the Potomac together and began to converge them west of Frederick in the vicinity of Sharpsburg. \u00a0By contrast\u00a0Lee\u2019s army straggled in from their scattered positions in Maryland on 15 & 16 Sep. but McClellan’s habitual caution allowed Lee the time to consolidate his position prior to the Union assault on the morning of the 17th.<\/p>\n

The first engagements between the two armies was on the night of 16 Sep when the Federal I Corps (Hooker) encountered rebel pickets.
\nDuring the night the Federal\u00a0\u00a0XII Corps (Mansfield) moved up in support of I Corps.<\/p>\n

At around 0600 on 17 Sep Hooker’s Corps advanced and attacked the Confederate Left in the area of the North and East Woods and the Cornfield that was held by Stonewall Jackson\u2019s Corps. \u00a0The attack was almost successful until Hooker’s Corps was hit in the flank by Hood\u2019s division who drove off the Union attack. \u00a0As the I Corps retreated Mansfield was told that he was needed to cover the broken I Corps or the battle was lost before it really began.<\/p>\n

As the XII Corps moved up to the attack Mansfield, it\u2019s commander was mortally wounded and confusion briefly reigned as the 1st Division commander established his command of the Corps
\nAt 0800 the XII Corps finally got into the fight and after heavy combat took and held the Dunker Church area unsupported by other Federal troops.<\/p>\n

\"Morning<\/a>

Morning attacks of the battle.
Map Courtesy USACMH<\/p><\/div>\n

At about 0830 the II Corps (Sumner) entered the battle passing through the area where I and XII Corps had been so severely handled by Jackson\u2019s Corps earlier. \u00a0As the II Corps advanced into the battered formation of Jackson\u2019s Corps they were \u00a0hit in the flank by Fresh troops Lee had sent from his right and last Confederate reserves who managed to halt the attack in and around the Dunker Church and Cornfield. \u00a0The failed attack by II Corps ended the first phase of the battle.<\/p>\n

In the afternoon Sumner wanted to attack the Confederate left again because he believed the Rebels were more badly damaged than him and with the reinforcements from VI Corps he had the chance to<\/p>\n

\"Afternoon<\/a>

Afternoon movement’s during the battle.
Map Courtesy USACMH<\/p><\/div>\n

crush the Confederate left. \u00a0The matter was referred to McClellan who denied permission for the attack and probably squandered the Union\u2019s best chance to decisively defeat Lee\u2019s Army, which was exhausted of reserves. \u00a0The IX Corps (Burnside) begins to enter the battle around the Burnside Bridge at approximately 1300. \u00a0At 1600 the IX Corps attacks towards Sharpsburg but the attack falters as the Corps is attacked in the flank by the Division of A.P. Hill and falls back to the bridge by 1700. \u00a0This was the last major Federal assault of the day and ended the battle although skirmishing continued.<\/p>\n

On 18 September both armies remained in position and Lee considered renewing the battle but taking his own casualties and federal strength into account he instead stars withdrawing his army south. \u00a0McLellan chose not to pursue the retreating Confederates out of a belief that Lee was falling back on significant reinforcements.<\/p>\n

\"Battle<\/a>

Battle casualties near the Dunker Church.
Image: Library of Congress<\/p><\/div>\n

With 3,782 dead and a total of 22,000 casualties out of 114,000 troops engaged the Battle of Antietam was the single bloodiest day in the history of American Arms<\/strong>. \u00a0\u00a0The next costliest battle I can think of that took place on one day and is continually mentioned is the D-Day invasion of Normandy. At D-Day the US had roughly 1,400 dead and a further 3,500 wounded out of approximately 80,000 invasion troops. \u00a0Casualties at Antietam were roughly 19% while at D-Day they were 4.5 % of troops engaged.<\/p>\n

An afterword is that an image was captured at Antietam that was a rarity prior to WWI. \u00a0Namely, Alexander Gardener captured an image of the battle as it was happening. \u00a0If you look at the below image on the left\u00a0side you can see Union cavalry lined up awaiting orders and on the right\u00a0side you can see the infantry of both armies fighting on the battle line wreathed in the smoke from artillery and their rifles. \u00a0If you blow the image up you can even see a couple of places where men\u00a0are dragging casualties away from the line. \u00a0Why this has not become an iconic image of the Civil War I have no idea.<\/p>\n

\"Photo<\/a>

Photo of the Antietam battlefield taken on the day of the battle by Alexander Gardner<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Battle of Antietam is interesting for several reasons the most important of which for me is that it is the single bloodiest day in American military history. There have been bloodier battles in American wars but no single day… Continue Reading →<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4433,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[88,1224,81,460],"tags":[309,1027,1020,293,1013,295,297,42,403,296,312,834,358,1037],"class_list":["post-4274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-campaigns-operations","category-modern-warfare","category-political-history","category-military-strategy","tag-abraham-lincoln","tag-american-history","tag-american-military-history","tag-antietam","tag-battle-analysis","tag-civil-war","tag-george-mcclellan","tag-military-art","tag-military-history","tag-robert-e-lee","tag-sharpsburg","tag-slavery","tag-total-war-19th-century","tag-us-civil-war"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4274"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5802,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4274\/revisions\/5802"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.military-history.us\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}