The new 2014 US Army Chief of Staff Professional Reading List (PRL) was recently released and I was relieved in the extreme to see that there was only one novel on the list, Once an Eagle by Anton Myrer. The list is different than earlier lists because it is organized topically instead of by position as earlier lists were. I have read many of the books on the list already and decided to read the ones I have not and post my thoughts on the books on the list.
Iraqi Military Makes Gains North of Baghdad in Conflict With ISIS: It will be interesting to see how the response to the ISIS offensive plays out both in Iraq and in the wider world. The INA is a broken reed and any gains they make will be fleeting. I fully expect a stalemate to ensue shortly wherein Iraq is effectively partitioned. We are saying the beginning of bloody fighting. Think of it as Sunni Triangle II.
Ukraine Says Russia Has 38,000 Troops on Border Amid ‘Invasion’: The biggest news out of this story is not that Russia is massing limited numbers of troops on the Ukraine border or even that Russian SF agitators are probably already in Eastern Ukraine but that Gazprom has cut off gas supplies to Ukraine. Supposedly through traffic to the EU is continuing but who thinks they won’t shut that off too if the EU gets too froggy about their support for Ukraine?
Putin Backs Cease-Fire in Ukraine Amid Russia Army Drills: I am simply amazed at the level of duplicity displayed by Russia regarding events in Ukraine. I am even more amazed that the Western powers are not calling them on it. It is obvious that the rebels are getting arms from the Russians yet the European powers refuse to acknowledge that and when Ukrainian or US authorities say it aloud the silence from our supposed allies is deafening.
Ebola ‘out of control’ in West Africa: MSF: A new strain of the Ebola virus is a potential nightmare. It is 90% lethal and apparently the strain currently spreading through West Africa is more easily transmitted than previous strains although news reports are not explicitly saying that. If this virus ever becomes airborne transmissible, all bets are off.
Kerry issues warning after Syria bombs Iraq: In the most ironic thing of all, I have to wonder if some Western leaders are privately beginning to think that Assad is not that bad after all? At least Assad made sure that his corner of the middle east was fairly stable, and it is obvious that a large chunk of the Syrian people support him as well.
ISIS Tries to Grab Its Own Air Force: The significance of Balad falling would not be in ISIS control of aircraft, but in Iraqi loss of same. I find it difficult to believe that ISIS counts a large number of pilots in its ranks, much less pilots qualified to operate combat aircraft and the aircrew to keep them operational. The fall of Balad and Taji, were it to occur, would be a further symptom of how rotten the Iraqi army is. Of course, I called that ten years ago when I was helping to establish the first Iraqi training program for the INA we were rebuilding.
BREAKING: ISIS Shows Off MASSIVE SCUD Missile in Military Parade: I am not certain that the Iraqis need to worry overmuch about ISIS getting their hands on artillery and SCUDs. Those are very technical weapons and if they are not served right are more dangerous o the operator than the enemy.
Poroshenko ends Ukraine ceasefire, says government will attack rebels: If Russia withdraws support for the rebels the separatists could be crushed within weeks. If however, Russia is just playing for time then this could last months yet. It is also significant that apparently someone has admitted that Russian control of European energy supplies is a major factor in the tepidness of the European response to blatant Russian aggression all along. Of course, the time for strong sanctions and pressure on Russia is now when energy needs are not as acute as they will be this coming winter.
Ukrainian forces tighten grip on Slavyansk as retreating rebels regroup: Now it is up to the Ukrainian Army to “keep up the skeer” and not pause in applying pressure to rebels who are now clearly on the defensive and have lost the initiative.
Hamas rockets reach Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: I am curious to see if Israel will finally be smart, ignore international public opinion, and teach the Palestinian Arabs a brutal, bloody lesson they won’t forget for a generation. They probably won’t though. The Israelis will piss around, kill some Arabs, lose a few troops, and go back to the status quo. Western leaders, Israel included, refuse to face the bitter truth that the only thing Arabs understand is force, everything else is weakness.
ISIS militants take sledgehammers to Mosul tomb of Prophet Jonah: Yet more peaceful destruction from the adherents of the Religion of Peace. Unless and until the Iraqi government gets their collective heads out of their 3rd point of contact ISIS and it’s adherents will continue to commit these outrages.
IDF strikes 80 Gaza targets in under thirty minutes: One would think that at some point the Israelis are just going to evict all the Arabs from Gaza and bulldoze the slums that have been built there.
Germany Cites Deep Rift With U.S. Amid Second Spy Case: If the allegations are true this is one of the dumbest possible things the US could do. Germany has been a staunch US ally since the founding of the FRG in 1949. What possible intelligence could be worth losing an ally?
Israeli troops wounded in first ground incursion in Gaza: I wonder how long it will take Hamas to organize a mass firing on an Israeli city in hopes of overwhelming the Iron Dome system? If something like that does happen then a ground invasion is a virtual certainty.
Russia warns Ukraine after shell crosses border: The fighting in Ukraine continues with government forces slowly making inroads and regaining control of territory. The likelihood of cross-border incidents only increases as gov. troops regain control of territory and I would not be surprised if at some point Russia does not use such an incident as a causus belli to get involved and support their proxies.
[FULL DISCLOSURE: I received my copy of this book free from the author. I was not paid for this review and the opinion expressed is purely my own]
This review is kind of different from what I normally do as it is mainly a review of book written as a critique and alternative to another book. The main review is of Edward Carpenter’s Steven Pressfield’s “The Warrior Ethos”: One Marine Officer’s Critique and Counterpoint, which is response to the inclusion of The Warrior Ethos on the Marine Corps Professional Reading List a few years ago.
That is unfortunate as The Warrior Ethos is essentially a piece of garbage book. Steven Pressfield is a historical fiction author who decided to write a book about what a warrior s and should aspire to be for the modern military. The Warrior Ethos is the result. It is essentially a cherry picking of historical and same fictional events and anecdotes that purports to be a moral and behavioral guide for the modern warrior. Almost all the anecdotes and events are drawn from ancient history, particularly Sparta. He is a former Marine having served in the 60’s but never having seen combat.
I think what gets me the most about this book is the almost adulatory tone towards the Spartans, a people who routinely exposed babies they saw as unfit, kept the majority of their population as slaves, mandated military training for all males, and looked at war as sport. There are some things about Spartans that are admirable, and their military abilities are one them. The oppression and abuse they heaped upon themselves to achieve that greatness extracted a high price tough. A price I am not convinced was worth the payoff.
The Warrior Ethos is a small book, only 112 pages and takes about 1 ½ hours to read. It is essentially new-age, psychobabble pap with a basis on a tyrannical, repressive ancient regime that did not survive more than 400 years or so. I am actually shocked that the book ended up on a professional reading list.
That being said Steven Pressfield’s “The Warrior Ethos”: One Marine Officer’s Critique and Counterpoint by Edward Carpenter is not very large either at only 124 pages. That is mainly because it does not require a lot of space to destroy what are the patently absurd ideas contained within Pressfield’s book. Edward Carpenter is a currently serving Marine Major and as he states in the foreword of his book, he felt compelled to write a critique after reading it. MAJ Carpenter divides his book into two parts; part I is the critique of Pressfield and part II is his counter-proposal for what a Warrior Ethos should consist of.
In part I he takes Pressfield’s assertions about warriors and warrior-hood and does an outstanding job of debunking them one by one often using text from Pressfield’s own book to do so. I don’t think I have seen a better job of hoisting someone on their own petard in good long while. Part I was actually a joy to read and I was unhappy that it was not longer as the idiocy in Pressfield’s points and assertions are brutally exposed for the fallacies they are.
Part II is the answer part to Pressfield’s assertions. It essentially goes through Pressfield’s book point by point and offers a countervailing view of what a warrior is and what a warrior ethos should contain. This part is likewise well written but I personally have many issues with the points he makes. That is probably due to my background as a combat arms soldier with combat under my belt and 23 years of experience.
If I have any issues with part II it is because from my perspective it is written from the PC point of view enforced by the modern military. He likes to toss out the overused and now essentially meaningless adjective of something or someone being misogynistic. That is a sop to the modern military fetish for ignoring the differences between men and women and heaping derision on those that point out such differences. There are in fact, observable and quantifiable differences between men and women and they cannot be put into the same box. That is not to say that men and women cannot be part of the same team, just that men and women largely cannot do all of the same things. Men and women complement each other, but do not replace each other. The modern military ignores this aspect at their peril.
I also have the traditional disdain of the line soldier for support troops. I acknowledge that without the clerks and jerks in the rear I would not have been able to engage in my passion for blowing things up and breaking stuff. However, there are attitude, mental, and motivational differences between somebody sitting in an ambush position waiting for the enemy and the guy running a fuel point on a secure FOB. I don’t think you can truthfully say that everyone wearing a uniform in the modern military is a warrior. That is just as much new age garbage as Pressfield’s ostensible claim that the only warrior is some bloodthirsty brute with veins in their teeth looking to kill. I don’t buy the notion that the “fobbits” and the guys going out the gate on a daily basis are equivalent.
I disagree with Carpenter’s definition of a warrior as “a person who willing to subordinate themselves to the demands of a country or a cause, and is willing to aid other members of their organization to engage in violence, and to kill or die or risk severe injury themselves to advance the interest of that cause.” That broad definition includes terrorists but I don’t have a problem with that. I have a problem that the definition equates the clerk working in the finance office with the spear thrower on the firing line. I would submit that the two activities are categorically different and the warrior is in fact the person on the line engaging in combat in the effort to “close with and destroy the enemy through the use of fire, maneuver, and shock effect” as my last Cavalry squadron’s mission statement put it.
He goes on in this vein through the rest of pat II attempting to craft a definition of warrior that is all-encompassing and therefore allows every person wearing a uniform in the modern military to style themselves a warrior. I understand the logic behind the effort having seen it at work during my last decade of service, I just disagree with it. A freedom I have, now that I am retired and no longer required to toe the party line in my words and actions.
I find that MAJ Carpenter’s book is well worth reading, especially his counterpoint, which gives some perspective on the way modern US military leadership is expected to think and the mental hoops they have to jump through to do so. As I state above, I understand the necessity for support troops. Some support troops indeed have inherently dangerous jobs such as EOD teams, fuel handlers, ammo handlers, and truck driver’s. That those jobs are inherently dangerous does not the people performing those jobs warriors though. A fuel line I not actively trying to kill you. That is why I firmly believe that the warrior is still and will always be the front line combat arms soldier.
I highly recommend MAJ Carpenter’s book as both a needed critique of The Warrior Ethos, but also as a look into how professional military officers have been trained to see the profession of arms. In order to fully understand the work though, you need to read Pressfield’s book first. The greater hope is that MAJ Carpenters erudite destruction of Pressfield’s garbage will cause the powers that be to rethink including Pressfield’s book on the professional reading list and will prompt its removal.
Breakout: Pioneers of the Future, Prison Guards of the Past, and the Epic Battle That Will Decide America’s Fate by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich would probably have been a more interesting book if it had introduced some new ideas. Sadly, it does not. The book is nothing more than a rehashing of the tired ideas that have been floating around in conservative circles for years.
One would think that in 209 pages of text at least one original idea would appear. The book is separated into 13 topical chapters with an introduction and a conclusion. There is an extensive notes section and a surprisingly good index.
The topics cover everything from Education, to Healthcare, to Government and Business and much in between. The essential argument of the book, and one I actually cannot disagree with is that the biggest problem in the US right now is government. Government regulation and intellectual luddites are stifling innovation and holding the country back from making the conceptual leaps and paradigm shift that it is capable of to extend American leadership into the 21st century and beyond.
Speaker Gingrich makes an eloquent argument that over-regulation and political interests are holding the country back. There is no reason for the current economic and societal malaise that we are not inflicting on ourselves. I found especially demining his description of the over-cautious FDA drug and device approval process and the ways in which oil exploration and extraction in the US is being deliberately slowed and even stopped. I share the Speakers concern that there is a large segment of people in America that actively want the country to fail and work to see that it does. I find it equally dismaying that such people even exist. What I don’t share is his optimism that there is a way out of the mess by working within the current system. I hope that he is right and I am wrong.
Regardless, this is a well written book that explains the many issues presented in a rational and non-extremist manner. Speaker Gingrich is a past master at making seemingly complex issues easy to understand, Breakout continues in that tradition and for that reason alone is worth reading. I recommend this book to anyone interested in contemporary politics and the ways in which said politics are stifling progress both societally and technologically.
From the opening months of the World War I, Flanders was the decisive sector for the British Army. It was in an around the medieval Belgian town of Ypres that the original BEF had decimated themselves fending off German attacks from October to December, 1914. Ypres and the salient surrounding it was where the British would see the hardest and most prolonged fighting of all the places where the British would fight in World War I.
The Battle of Messines Ridge fought from 7-14 June, 1914 was not really a separate battle at all but rather the opening phase of what would come to be known variously as the Third Battle of Ypres or Passchendaele.
The Messines Ridge is on the southern shoulder of what was then the Ypres salient. It is commanding terrain the possession of which allowed the German army to see almost all the way into the center of the city of Ypres itself and observe British movements inside the salient allowing the Germans to target British concentrations of troops very accurately.
The Ridge itself is not very high, about 90 feet, but that was more than high enough for military purposes given the flat nature of the terrain in Flanders near the coast. I never fully appreciated the advantage to be gained from possession of a 90 foot ridge-line until my first visit to the battlefield in 2004 while on R&R from my tour in Iraq. In Flanders a 90 foot difference in elevation makes all the difference in the world.
Possession of the Messines Ridge would allow the British to deny observation of a significant portion of their rear area to the German army and would also serve as an excellent stepping off point for follow on offensive operations both to expand the salient and effect the ever elusive breakout that all generals from any side fervently wished for.
The immediate commander and primary planner for the British forces in the lead-up to Messines Ridge was Gen. Herbert Plumer who had the unfortunate reputation with Haig of being a plodder. Plumer reputation among the troops however was different. He was on of the few British generals who the troops adored or even loved because of his well-known concern for their welfare and desire to avoid excessive casualties.
The plan Plumer came up with to take the ridge entailed the explosion of 25 mines that the Royal Army had laboriously emplaced under the ridge in the months leading up to the commencement of the offensive. The mines ranged in size from the 96,500 lb St. Eloi mine to the 30,000 lb Petit Bois mines. These were set to essentially demolish and demoralize the German front line trenches whereupon the British troops were expected to easily occupy them before the stunned Germans could react and throw them out.
A creeping barrage by 2/3 of the 2,200 artillery pieces available was to “shoot the attacking infantry in” once the mines exploded. The rest of the artillery was reserved for use in the counter battery role to suppress German artillery to a depth of 9,000 yards along the attack front.
A preliminary bombardment lasting almost two weeks was also planned for the preparing the battlefield and hindering the Germans from reinforcing the sector to be attacked. (NOTE: preliminary bombardments of this style were not meant so much to destroy defensive works so much as to demoralize the enemy, injure defenders, and keep the enemies head down allowing attacking infantry to assault when the time came)
The Messines battle was the opening act of what was ultimately planned to be a British rupture of the German defenses in Flanders. The overall plan failed.
At approximately 3:10 a.m. on the morning of June 7th, 1917 19 of the 25 emplaced mines exploded. The 4 Birdcage mines were not detonated because the Germans had already evacuated the area by Zero-Hour and two failed to explode. The mines were wildly successful and the British troops did indeed essentially waltz into the German positions and establish occupancy.
The Germans attempted to counterattack on day one but they were unable to keep the British from occupying and holding the entirety of the first three lines of German trenches except for a portion of their third line which they retook from II ANZAC Corps.
On the morning of 8 June the II ANZAC Corps retook the section of the German third line they had been ejected from. The rest of the British assault divisions set about consolidating the defenses in the newly won positions while the British artillery provided disrupting fire on German counterattacks while a portion of the artillery was displaced forward.
German artillery unleashed a massive bombardment on the captured trenches during which it is estimated that the British suffered up to 90% of their casualties during the battle.
Once large-scale German counterattacks stopped on 14 June the Messines sector settled down until the Passchendaele battle restarted active fighting in the beginning of July.
The Battle for Messines Ridge was one of the few arguably successful offensives of World War I prior to the offensives of the Last Hundred Days in 1918.